Dino Melaye Appeals Tribunal Verdict, Lists 23 Grounds At Appeal Court

Senator Dino Melaye (Kogi West) has approached the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal seeking to upturn the unfavourable election tribunal verdict which nullified his February 23, 2019 election.

The senator is therefore seeking an order of the court to set aside the Friday, August 23, 2019 judgement of the Kogi State National and State Houses of Assembly Election Tribunal.

The candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) at the said election, Senator Smart Adeyemi had petitioned the Election Tribunal, challenging the electoral victory of Melaye of the PDP. The Tribunal nullified the election and ordered for a fresh poll within 90 days.

But Melaye disagreed with the majority verdict of the Tribunal and consequently appealed the judgement at the Court of Appeal with 23 grounds of appeal where the Tribunal is said to have erred in law.

According to the Notice of Appeal dated September 5, 2019, Senator Melaye being the appellant also sought two other reliefs which include an order of the Court of Appeal allowing his appeal; and an order sustaining his objection to the petition or dismissing the petition and confirming his electoral victory.

The appeal, which was filed on behalf of the lawmaker by his counsel, the law firm of Rickey Tarfa (SAN), has Senator Smart Adeyemi, All Progressivess Congress (APC), Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as respondents.

Some of the grounds of appeal include whether the person sued at the Tribunal being Senator Dino Melaye, is the same as the person who contested the poll and declared winner of the election as contained on Form CF001 – Melaye Daniel Dino.

“The provision of the law is that the name as used in Form CF001 is the only valid name that can be used to challenge the election of the Appellant.

“The principle of equity accepted and applied by the majority members of the Tribunal cannot override the provisions of the law in respect of the petition.

“The judgement of the Tribunal was perverse and against the weight of evidence before the it,” the Notice of Appeal said among several other issues of law raised.

Share This Article

More Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.